Agronano-mediated applications for the alleviation of stress and boosting of crop health for the future of smart high-yield agriculture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55006/biolsciences.2024.4304Keywords:
Agricultural land, Nanotechnology, Nanomaterials, Nanochemicals, Oxidative stress, Nano based detection toolsAbstract
Nanotechnology acquired prominence in the third decade of the twenty-first century due to its rapid growth and widespread application in a variety of disciplines, including medical science, the pharmaceutical business, energy conservation, and the food industry. Nanotechnology (NT) is the study and application of nanomaterials (NMs), which range in size from 0.1 to 100 nm. Sustainable agriculture is critical for the growing civilization and its massive population. The goal of nanomaterials (NMs) in agriculture is to protect crops from a variety of pests, microbial diseases, and fungal diseases while reducing the amount of toxic chemicals that are spread, minimizing nutrient losses in fertilization, and increasing yielding capacity through the use of nanochemicals, nanopesticides, and nanofertilizers without decontaminating agricultural land or irrigation water. Nanotechnology has the ability to sense crop health and monitor soil quality in agricultural regions. Researchers have discovered that a number of nanoparticles, including Cu, Zn, Ni, ZnO, Fe, Ag, Al, TiO2, and Al2O3, have deleterious effects on plant development, metabolism, and stress regulation. In addition to investigating how nanoparticles (NPs) help to regulate oxidative stress—the generation of excessive amounts of ROS—and other types of abiotic stress in plant cells, this study focuses on the current benefits and applications of nanotechnology for the improvement of sustainable agriculture. However, nanoparticles have been shown to be non-regulatory for earthworms and some beneficial rhizosperic bacterial populations. Thus, judicious application of nanoparticles is strongly advised to improve plant immunity without hampering the overall homeostasis of environment.
Downloads
References
1. Zhao L, Lu L, Wang A et al (2020) Nano-biotechnology in agriculture: use of nanomaterials to promote plant growth and stress tolerance. J Agric Food Chem 68 (7):1955-1947.
2. Nile SH, Baskar V, Selvaraj D et al (2020) Nanotechnologies in food science: applications, recent trends and future perspectives, Nanomicro. Lett 12(1):45.
3. Prasad R, Bhattacharya A, Nguyen QD (2017) Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: recent developments, challenges and perspectives. Front Microbiol 8:1014.
4. Zhang P, Guo Z, LuoWet al (2020) Graphene oxide-induced pH alteration, iron overload and subsequent oxidative damage in rice (Oryza sativa L.): a new mechanism of nanomaterial phytotoxicity. Environ Sci Technol 54(6):3181-3190.
5. Khan MN, Mobin M, Abbas ZK et al (2017) Role of nanomaterials in plants under challenging environments, Plant PhysiolBiochem 110:194-209.
6. Kumar V, Shriram V, Hoque, TS et al (2017) Glycine betaine-mediated abiotic oxidative-stress tolerance in plants: physiological and biochemical mechanisms. In: Sarwat M et al (eds)Stress Signaling in Plants: Genomics and Proteomics Perspective, vol 2. Springer International, Switzerland, pp 111–133.
7. Kumar V, Sharma M, Khare T et al (2018) Impact of nanoparticles on oxidative stress and responsive antioxidant defence in plants. In: Tripathi DK, Ahmad P, Sharma S et al (eds) Nanomaterials in Plants, Algae, and Microorganisms, vol 1. Academic Press, pp 393–406.
8. Adhikari, D. (2024). Biotic and Abiotic Stresses and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)-Mediated Signalling in Higher Plants: Regulatory Mediators and their Mechanism of Actions. International Journal of International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470.
9. Manimaran, M. (2015). A review on nanotechnology and its implications in agriculture and food industry. Asian J Plant Sci Res, 5(7), 13-15.
10. Baruah S, Dutta J. Nanotechnology applications in pollution sensing and degradation in agriculture: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2009; 7:191-204.
11. Jampilek, J., &Kráľová, K. (2015). Application of nanotechnology in agriculture and food industry, its prospects and risks. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S, 22(3), 321-361.
12. Vermeiren L, Devlieghere F, Debevere J. Effectiveness of some recent antimicrobial packaging concepts. Food Additives and Contaminants Part A. 2002;19(Suppl):163-171.
13. Necula AM, Dunca S, Stoica I, Olaru N, Olaru L, Ioan S. Morphological properties and antibacterial activity of nano-silver containing cellulose acetate phthalate films. International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization. 2010;15(6):341-350.
14. Kim B, Kim D, Cho D, Cho S. Bactericidal effect of TiO2 photocatalyst on selected food-borne pathogenic bacteria. Chemosphere. 2003;52(1):277-281.
15. Pizzino G, Irrera N, Cucinotta M et al (2017) Oxidative stress: harms and benefits for human health. Oxid Med Cell Longev.
16. Sharma P, Jha AB, Dubey RS et al (2012) Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidant defence mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J Bot 217–237.
17. Dumont S, Rivoal J (2019) Consequences of oxidative stress on plant glycolytic and respiratory metabolism. Front. Plant Sci 10:166. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00166
18. Chaki M, Begara-Morales JC, Barroso JB. Oxidative Stress in Plants. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;9(6):481.
19. Sachdev, S., Ahmad, S. (2021). Role of Nanomaterials in Regulating Oxidative Stress in Plants. In: Al-Khayri, J.M., Ansari, M.I., Singh, A.K. (eds) Nanobiotechnology. Springer, Cham.
20. Scandalios JG. Oxidative stress: molecular perception and transduction of signals triggering antioxidant gene defences. Brazilian J Medic Biologic Res. 2005;38(7):995-1014.
21. Chourasia, K.N.; Lal, M.K.; Tiwari, R.K.; Dev, D.; Kardile, H.B.; Patil, V.U.; Kumar, A.; Vanishree, G.; Kumar, D.; Bhardwaj, V.; et al. Salinity Stress in Potato: Understanding Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Responses. Life 2021, 11, 545.
22. Fu PP, Xia Q, Hwang HM et al (2014) Mechanisms of nanotoxicity: generation of reactive oxygen species. J Food Drug Anal 22:64–75
23. Ju-Nam Y, Lead JR (2008) Manufactured nanoparticles: an overview of their chemistry, interactions and potential environmental implications. Sci Total Environ 400(1–3):396–414.
24. Jalil SU, Ansari MI (2019) Nanoparticles and abiotic stress tolerance in plants: synthesis, action and signalling mechanisms, In: Khan MIR, Reddy PS, Ferrante A, Khan NA (eds) Plant signalling molecules-role and regulation under stressful environments. Elsevier Publication, United Kingdom, pp 549–561.
25. Moshirian Farahi SM, Taghavizadeh Yazdi ME, Einafshar E, et al. The effects of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles on physiological, biochemical, and antioxidant properties of Vitex plant (Vitex agnus - Castus L). Heliyon. 2023;9(11): e22144.
26. Burman U, Saini M, Kumar P (2013) Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on growth and antioxidant system of chickpea seedlings. Toxicol Environ Chem 95(4):605–612.
27. Hatami M, Ghorbanpour M (2013) Effect of nano silver on physiological performance of pelargonium plants exposed to dark storage. J Hortic Res 21(1):15–20.
28. Aghdam MTB, Mohammadi H, Ghorbanpour M (2016) Effects of nanoparticulate anatase titanium dioxide on physiological and biochemical performance of Linum usitatissimum (Linaceae) underwell-watered and drought stress conditions. Braz J Bot 39(1):139–146.
29. Mohammadi H, Esmailpour M, Gheranpaye A (2016) Effects of TiO2 nanoparticles and water-deficit stress on morpho-physiological characteristics of dragonhead (DracocephalummoldavicaL.) plants. Acta Agric Slov 107(2):385–396.
30. Latef AAHA, Alhmad MFA, Abdelfattah KE (2017) The possible roles of priming with Nanoparticles in mitigation of salinity stress in lupine (Lupinus termis) plants. J Plant GrowthRegul. 36(1):60–70.
31. Venkatachalam P, Jayaraj M, Manikandan R et al (2017) Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs)alleviate heavy metal-induced toxicity in Leucaena leucocephala seedlings: a physiochemical analysis. Plant PhysiolBiochem 110:59–69.
32. Hussain A, Rizwan M, Ali Q et al (2019) Seed priming with silicon nanoparticles improved the biomass and yield while reduced the oxidative stress and cadmium concentration in wheat grains. Environ Sci Pollut R26(8):7579–7588.
33. Rikabad MM, Pourakbar L, Moghaddam SS et al (2019) Agrobiological, chemical and antioxidant properties of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) exposed to TiO2 nanoparticles and ultraviolet-B stress.Ind. Crop Prod 137:137–143.
34. Upadhyaya H, Shome S, Tewari S et al (2020) Responses to ZnO nanoparticles during water stress in Oryza sativa L. J Stress PhysiolBiochem 16(2):67–76.
35. Denaxa NK, Damvakaris T, Roussos PA (2020) Antioxidant defense system in young olive plants against drought stress and mitigation of adverse effects through external application of alleviating products. Sci Hortic 259:108812.
36. Zhao L, Lu L, Wang A et al (2020) Nano-biotechnology in agriculture: use of nanomaterials to promote plant growth and stress tolerance. J Agric Food Chem 68(7):1935–1947.
37. Rizwan, M., Ali, S., ur Rehman, M.Z. et al. Effect of foliar applications of silicon and titanium dioxide nanoparticles on growth, oxidative stress, and cadmium accumulation by rice (Oryza sativa). Acta Physiol Plant 41, 35 (2019).
38. Kumar V, Sharma M, Khare T, Shabir H. Wani, Chapter 17 - Impact of Nanoparticles on Oxidative Stress and Responsive Antioxidative Defense in Plants, Editor(s): Durgesh Kumar Tripathi, Parvaiz Ahmad, Shivesh Sharma, Devendra Kumar Chauhan, Nawal Kishore Dubey, Nanomaterials in Plants, Algae, and Microorganisms, Academic Press, 2018, Pages 393-406.
39. Li et al., 2020Z. Li, et al. Agricultural nanodiagnostics for plant diseases: recent advances and challenges. Nanoscale Adv., 2 (8) (2020), pp. 3083-3094.
40. Lau et al., 2017H.Y. Lau, et al.Specific and sensitive isothermal electrochemical biosensor for plant pathogen DNA detection with colloidal gold nanoparticles as probesSci. Rep., 7 (1) (2017), pp. 1-7.
41. S. Khaledian, et al.A sensitive biosensor based on gold nanoparticles to detect Ralstonia solanacearum in soilJ. Gen. Plant Pathol., 83 (2017), pp. 231-239.
42. Fang, Y.; Ramasamy, R.P. Current and Prospective Methods for Plant Disease Detection. Biosensors 2015, 5, 537–561.
43. Manjit Kumar Ray et al.Nanotechnolgy as a Promising Tool against Phytopathogens: A Futuristic Approach to Agriculture, agriculture.,2023.
44. Oluwaseun, A.C.; Phazang, P.; Sarin, N.B. Biosensing Technologies for the Detection of Pathogens—A Prospective Way for Rapid Analysis; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018.
45. Shivashakarappa, K.; Reddy, V.; Tupakula, V.K.; Farnian, A.; Vuppula, A.; Gunnaiah, R. Nanotechnology for the Detection ofPlant Pathogens. Plant Nano Biol. 2022, 2, 100018.
46. Miao, Y.; Zhao, S.; Gao, Y.; Wang, R.; Wu, Q.; Wu, H.; Luo, T. Curcumin Pretreatment Attenuates Inflammation and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Experimental Stroke: The Possible Role of Sirt1 Signalling. Brain Res. Bull. 2016, 121, 9-15
47. Siddiqui, M.H.; Al-Whaibi, M.H.; Firoz, M.; Al-Khaishany, M.Y. Role of Nanoparticles in Plants. In Nanotechnology and PlantSciences: Nanoparticles and Their Impact on Plants; Siddiqui, M.H., Al-Whaibi, M.H., Mohammad, F., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 19–35.
48. Ameen, F; Alsamhary, K; Alabdullatif, J.A.; A.L. Nadhari, S. A Review on Metal-Based Nanoparticles and Their Toxicity to Beneficial Soil Bacteria and Fungi. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 213, 112027.
49. Zhang, P.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Fu.; H, White, J.C.; Lynch, I. Nanomaterial Transformation in the Soil-Plant System: Implications for Food Safety and Application in Agriculture. Small 2020, 16, e2000705.
50. Pallas, G.; Peijnenburg, W.J.G.M., Guinee, J.B., Heijungs, R.; Vijver, M.G. Green and Clean: Reviewing the Justification of Claims for Nanomaterials from a Sustainability Point of View. Sustainability 2018, 10, 689.
51. Xu, L.; Liu, Y., Bai, R.; Chen, C. Applications and Toxicological Issues Surrounding Nanotechnology in the Food Industry. Pure Appl. Chem. 2010, 82, 349-372.
52. Singh, K. & Fatima, N. 2022. The Efficiency of Earthworms as a Biomarker of Environmental Pollution. International Journal of Biological Innovations, 04 (01): 104-112.
53. Wu, Q., Huang, K., Sun, H., Ren, H., Zhang, X. XIANG., & Ye, L. (2018). Comparison of the impacts of zinc ions and zinc nanoparticles on nitrifying microbial community. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 343, 166-175.
54. Fajardo, C., Sacca, M. L., Costa, G., Nande, M., & Martin, M. (2014). Impact of Ag and Al2O3 nanoparticles on soil organisms: In vitro and soil experiments. Science of the Total Environment, 473-474, 254-261.
55. Zhao, J., Cao, X., Liu, X., Wang, Z.,Zhang, C., White, J. C., & Xing, B. (2016). Interactions of CuO nanoparticles with the algae Chlorella pyrenoidosa: Adhesion, uptake, and toxicity. Nanotoxicology, 10(9), 1297-1305.
56. Gambardella, C., Costa, E., Piazza, V., Fabbrocini, A., Magi, E., Faimali, M.,& Garaventa, F. (2015). Effect of Silver nanoparticles on marine organisms belonging to different trophic levels. Marine Environmental Research, 111, 41-49.
57. Shah, V., Dobiasova, P., Baldrian, P., Nerud, F., Kumar, A., & Seal, S. (2010). Influence of iron and copper nanoparticle powder on the production of lignocellulose degrading enzymes in the fungus Trametes versicolor. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 178(1-3), 1141-1145.
58. Bayat, N., Rajapakse, K., Marinsek-Logar, R., Drobne, D., & Cristobal, S. (2014). The effects of engineered nanoparticles on the cellular structure and growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nanotoxicology, 8(4), 363-373.
59. Lebdev, S., Yausheva, E., Galaktinova, L. & Sizova, E. 2016. Impact of molybdenum nanoparticles on survival, activity of enzymes, and chemical elements in Eisenia fetidausing test on artificial substrata. Environmental Science and pollution research international, 23 (18): 18099-18110.
60. Samrot, A.V., Justin, C., Padmanaban, S. & Burman, U. 2016. A study on the effect of chemically synthesized magnetite nanoparticles on earthworm: Eudriluseuginae. Applied Nanoscience, 7 (1-2): 17-23.
61. Adhikari D. Plant Heat Shock Proteins - Origin, Evolution and Mechanism of Action for Biotechnological Implications in Crop Improvement, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJIRSET). Volume 13, Issue 3, March 2024.
62. Das, P and Adhikari D. Role of epigenetics and the high-throughput sensing techniques to detect stress adaptation mechanisms in crop plants: A mini review. Innovations in Agriculture 2023, 6:01-07.
63. Adhikari et al., (2016). Biotic and Abiotic Stressors In Plant Molecular Breeding vis-Ă -vis Sustainable Molecular Farming Strategies For Food Security: Threats, Opportunities and Challenges Ahead in Indian Perspectives. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Educatio. 2(3)3, 609-617.
64. Adhikari, et al., (2007). In vitro hemolysis and lipid peroxidation inducing activity of the tentacle extract of the sea anemone (Paracondylactis indicus Dave.) on rat erythrocytes, Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 39(3), 155-159.
65. Adhikari, D., 2019. Augmentation of mitodepressive and cytogenetic effects of Lead upon acute exposure on Grass Pea (Lathyrus sativus L.,) root tip cells. American Journal of Biological Sciences. 1(1): 14-22.
66. Adhikari, D., 2021. Chromium induces genotoxicity in root tip cells of Grass Pea (Lathyrus sativus L., Variety Nirmal): A ROS mediated acute toxicity study. (2021) Journal of Stress Physiology and Biochemistry, 17(2): 98-120.
67. Adhikari, D., and Karmakar, S., 2018. In vitro Pro-inflammatory Activity and Associated Pharmacological Activities of Paracondylactis indicus Dave. Nematocyst Venom. Pharmacologia, 9: 114-121.
68. Adhikari, D., and Pal, S., (2015). Molecular Markers in Plant Based Bioassays for the Detection of Levels of Endpoints to Probe of Aquatic Genotoxicity. Journal of Environment and Sociobiology. 12(2), 143-162.
69. Adhikari, D., Ghosh, R., Dig, S., 2024. Evaluation of salinity-mediated end-point cytogenotoxicity in Germinating Roots of Lathyrus sativus L., Variety Mahatora.: Bio-assay guided biomarker studies. Innovations in Agriculture 7: 1–17.
70. Adhikari, D., Ghosh, T. and Ghosh, R., 2023. A Comprehensive Comparative Study on Cascabela thevetia(L.) Lippold, Seed Aqueous Extract-mediated Escalation of Abiotic Stress and Cellular Genotoxicity: Insights from Multivariate Allelochemical Analysis vis-a-vis Employment of Plant Bioassays (Lathyrus sativus L., and Allium sativum L., germinating root tip cells). Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, 19 (4), 178-202.
71. Ghosh, T., Mukherjee, S., Adhikari, D., 2020 Evaluation of acute toxicity studies on copper-induced oxidative stress in Lathyrus sativus L., (variety Ratan) germinating seeds: A biomarker-based risk assessment. Journal of Advance Scientific Research: 11(4); 43-254.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dipayan Bandyopadhyay, Dipan Adhikari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
