---

Post-publication Discussions and Corrections  

At IR Research Publications, we are committed to fostering open and constructive scientific discourse. We recognize the importance of post-publication discussions and corrections to ensure the integrity and accuracy of the research we publish. To facilitate this, we have established the guideline.

Discussion

IR Research Publications encourages vibrant post-publication debates and discussions as a means of enriching scientific discourse. We value the diverse perspectives and insights of the scientific community. To facilitate constructive discussions, we have outlined the following guidelines.

Authors, readers, and the scientific community are invited to engage in discussions on our journal's website, utilizing designated sections for post-publication debates.

Letters to the editor that contribute to the ongoing discussion are also welcomed and should be submitted through the specified channels.

Recognizing the importance of external moderated platforms, authors are encouraged to participate in discussions on platforms such as PubPeer. These platforms provide an additional avenue for open dialogue and peer engagement.

All participants in post-publication discussions are expected to maintain a respectful and constructive tone. Critique should focus on the scientific content and ideas presented rather than personal attacks.

Avoid inflammatory language or statements that could hinder a productive exchange of ideas.

Clearly articulate points of disagreement or areas that merit further exploration. Provide evidence and references to support arguments and viewpoints.

Disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may influence the discussion.

The editorial team will moderate discussions to ensure they remain focused on scientific content and adhere to ethical standards.

In cases where discussions veer off-topic or violate community guidelines, the editorial team reserves the right to intervene and, if necessary, close or moderate the discussion.

Authors are encouraged to actively participate in post-publication discussions related to their work. This engagement can include responding to queries, providing clarifications, and acknowledging valid points raised by other contributors.

The author's participation contributes to the collaborative and iterative nature of scientific inquiry.

Post-publication discussions will be regularly monitored by the editorial team. Valuable insights or corrections identified through these discussions may be considered for further editorial review and potential updates to the published content.

When referencing or citing specific points from post-publication discussions, provide proper attribution to the original contributors. This ensures that credit is given where it is due and fosters a culture of academic integrity.

Corrections

At IR Research Publications, we understand that the scientific landscape is dynamic, and new information or insights may emerge after the publication of an article. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of our published content, we have established the following guidelines for authors seeking corrections and revisions post-publication.

Submission Process

Authors intending to submit corrections or revisions should send a detailed request, including the specific changes required, to the editorial office of the respective journal.

The submission should clearly state the reasons for the corrections or revisions and provide supporting evidence, if applicable.

Timeliness

Authors are encouraged to submit correction requests in a timely manner after the identification of errors or the need for revisions.

The editorial team will prioritize the prompt review and processing of correction submissions to ensure the timely dissemination of accurate information.

Correction Types

Corrections may include factual errors, typographical mistakes, or clarifications. Authors should clearly specify the type of correction needed.

Revisions may involve updates to methodologies, additional data, or other substantive changes. The reasons for revisions should be clearly articulated in the submission.

Transparency

Authors must prioritize transparency when submitting corrections or revisions. Clearly communicate the changes made, providing context and ensuring that readers can understand the nature of the modifications.

If applicable, authors should acknowledge any contributors or collaborators who aided in identifying the need for corrections.

Editorial Review

The editorial team will thoroughly review all correction and revision submissions. This process may involve consultation with peer reviewers, subject matter experts, or additional editorial assessments.

The decision to accept or reject a correction or revision will be communicated to the authors along with feedback and recommendations for further improvements if necessary.

Correction Notices

Upon acceptance of corrections or revisions, a formal correction notice will be issued. This notice will be prominently displayed alongside the original article to inform readers of the changes made.

Correction notices will be written in a clear and concise manner, providing a summary of the modifications and the reasons behind them.

Retractions

In cases where errors are significant or ethical concerns arise, authors may be advised to consider retracting the article. The decision to retract will be made in accordance with established ethical guidelines.

Article Retraction Guideline

IR Research Publication is committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and accuracy in scientific research. In certain circumstances, it may become necessary to retract a fully published article due to identified errors, misconduct, or other significant issues. We have developed the following policy to guide authors, editors, and the journal in the article retraction process.

Grounds for Article Retraction
>Research Misconduct: When there is evidence of fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or other forms of research misconduct that invalidate the findings presented in the article.

>Serious Errors: When significant errors are identified that materially affect the validity, reliability, or interpretation of the research findings, and cannot be adequately addressed through corrections or amendments.

>Ethical Concerns: When ethical issues arise, such as undisclosed conflicts of interest, ethical approval violations, or inadequate informed consent, which undermine the integrity of the research.

>Duplicate Publication: When substantial portions of the article have been published elsewhere without proper acknowledgment or justification.

>Legal or Regulatory Requirements: When legal or regulatory authorities mandate the retraction due to violations of applicable laws, regulations, or ethical guidelines.

Retraction Request

Authors who wish to withdraw a published article must submit a formal written request to the journal's editorial office. The request should include the article title, author names, manuscript identification number (if available), and a detailed explanation for the retraction. The retraction request should be signed by all co-authors, confirming their agreement to retract the article. If the article has multiple authors, the corresponding author should be responsible for coordinating the retraction process and communicating with the journal.

Editorial Assessment
Upon receipt of a retraction request, the journal's editorial office will evaluate the request and assess the grounds for retraction. The editorial office may seek additional information or clarification from the authors, reviewers, or other relevant parties to make an informed decision. If the retraction request is deemed reasonable and justified, the article will be considered for retraction. The decision to retract the article rests with the journal's editor-in-chief or the editorial board.

Publication Record

A retraction notice titled "Retraction: [article title]" will be published in a later issue of the journal, specifically in the section with page numbers, and will be listed in the contents list. In the online version, there will be a hyperlink directing readers to the original article. Prior to accessing the article itself, readers will be presented with a screen displaying the retraction notice. The original article will remain unchanged except for the addition of a watermark on each page indicating that it has been "retracted" in PDF format. The HTML version of the document will be deleted.

Article Withdrawal Guideline

At IR Research Publication, we understand that there may be circumstances where it becomes necessary to withdraw a published article. This applies solely to preliminary versions of articles that have been accepted for publication but have not undergone formal publishing processes. These early versions lack complete volume/issue/page information and may occasionally contain errors or unintentional duplicate submissions. We have developed the following policy to guide authors, editors, and the journal in the article withdrawal process.

Grounds for Article Withdrawal
>Significant errors or inaccuracies in the article that compromise the integrity of the research or its conclusions.

>Plagiarism, data fabrication, or any form of scientific misconduct.

>Ethical concerns, such as human or animal rights violations or failure to obtain appropriate consent.

>Legal issues, including copyright infringement or violation of intellectual property rights.

Withdrawal Request

Authors who wish to withdraw a published article must submit a formal written request to the journal's editorial office. The request should include the article title, author names, manuscript identification number (if available), and a detailed explanation for the withdrawal. The withdrawal request should be signed by all co-authors, confirming their agreement to withdraw the article. If the article has multiple authors, the corresponding author should be responsible for coordinating the withdrawal process and communicating with the journal.

Editorial Assessment
Upon receipt of a withdrawal request, the journal's editorial office will evaluate the request and assess the grounds for withdrawal. The editorial office may seek additional information or clarification from the authors, reviewers, or other relevant parties to make an informed decision. If the withdrawal request is deemed reasonable and justified, the article will be considered for withdrawal. The decision to withdraw the article rests with the journal's editor-in-chief or the editorial board.

Publication Record

If an article is withdrawn, the article will be marked with a prominent notice indicating the reason for withdrawal, ensuring transparency and maintaining the journal's credibility. The article's metadata, including the title, author names, and abstract, still be accessible in databases and search engines, but the full-text content will be removed or replaced with the withdrawal notice.

---